Skip to content

Evidence guide

Technical project and business-component evidence

The four-part test is answered with records: what the component was meant to do, what was unknown at the start, what was tried and what happened. The records that carry most weight were made while the work was being done.

Records by test element

ElementRecords
Permitted purposeSpecifications, project plans, requirements with measurable targets
Technological in natureDesign analyses, calculations, models
Elimination of uncertaintyKickoff materials, risk registers, early tickets that state the open question
Process of experimentationTest plans and results, prototype logs, design iterations in tickets and commits

Per business component

Keep the records for each component separate, or tagged with its project code. The mock audit asks the four-part-test questions per project, and a record that cannot be placed with a component cannot support it.

Timing and provenance

A narrative written for the claim after the year end can organize the evidence; it cannot stand in for it. Date-stamped tickets, test workbooks and commits are what show the work happened as described. A TaxTrex position paper is valuable for the same reason: its surveys are time-stamped during the year.

Common gaps

  • A project tracked in a separate tool whose export was never pulled.
  • Tests run but results not kept.
  • A kickoff deck that lists goals but not what was uncertain.

General in nature, not tax advice.

Find out what your research actually qualifies for

A scoping conversation takes thirty minutes and costs nothing. You leave with a view on eligibility, likely credit range and the documentation you would need.

Free R&D mock audit: completely free. Book a call or email hello@creditarmor.ai for a login.